A November deal was expected, and there were reports that a U.S. location was under consideration, like Iowa, as suggested by the administration, or Alaska and Hawaii, as proposed by China. An absolute deadline for a deal would be Dec. 15, the day a new round of tariffs on Chinese goods is set to go into effect.
Stocks have run up on optimism about trade progress but have been languishing in the past two sessions as the market digests recent gains to new highs and no news on the trade front. Trump and Xi had been expected to sign the agreement in Chile on the sidelines of the APEC meeting, but Chile announced last week that it could not host the Nov. 16 meeting due to protests in that country.
“We basically used up the good news, and we’re in this time where we need a booster shot. We need some news to keep us going,” said Art Cashin, UBS’ director of NYSE floor operations.
Art Hogan, chief market strategist at National Securities, said investors are anxious for details on the signing. “Once you find the location, you slap a date on it. Things get signed, and we move on. This would remove a lot of the headwinds,” he said.
Hogan said investors want to see a phase one deal that stops the escalation of tariffs and possible rollback of others. “If you stop the escalation, it puts certainty back into the economy and you might even get some capex spending which has been missing for the past 18 months,” he said.
Cashin said the market was not concerned about where the meeting will be held, but the report on the timing was key since the longer talks go on, the more chances of a problem. Cashin said he did not believe Xi would come to the U.S. for a meeting because it could look like he was giving ground to Trump.
No ‘state’ visit
Evercore analysts, in a note Wednesday, also said Xi won’t come to the U.S., and they hypothesized a list of possible trade outcomes.
“President Xi won’t come to the US — not Iowa, Hawaii, Alaska, DC or elsewhere. No ‘state’ visit. The ‘unpredictable’ (Trump) risk precludes this. Mistrust dominates,” the Evercore strategists noted. “The interim ‘Phase 1’ deal is insufficient to command presidential signatures. We expect ministerial-level signing at the ministerial level.”
As of now, Evercore sees only three points of agreement, and the Chinese request for a rollback of existing tariffs was not one of them. They see a delay in the Dec. 15 tariffs, agricultural sales to China and Chinese financial markets open further.
Other policy strategists believe a deal will be reached, including agricultural sales to China and U.S. relief on the blacklisting of Chinese telecom firm Huawei. Dan Clifton, head of policy research at Strategas, said U.S. exports of liquified natural gas have again become part of the discussion, and a source close to the discussions told CNBC energy was part of phase one talks.
‘Catastrophic for both sides’
“We’re at the end, and there’s volatility at the end of the discussions,” said Clifton. “But the cost of a blowup here would be catastrophic for both sides. I think you have a 15% chance of a blowup. We’re really trying to move the Rubic’s cube so both sides can walk away and be able to declare victory.”
Tom Block, Washington strategist at Fundstrat, said a deal will get done, and Trump may not need a signing ceremony as much as the opportunity to make a speech about the success of the deal.
“Whether it’s done with a phone call and sending their ministers to sign it, or they can figure out some signing ceremony. I don’t think that’s as important as that they seem to be closing in on a deal,” Block said.
Clifton said the Trump administration is eager to get a deal done because of a softening economy, but China is as well, since it has been concerned about rising food costs and a loss of exports. He said a deal will get done, regardless of whether Trump and Xi meet.
“I think everybody is giving each other an exit ramp. I can feel both sides preparing their part to sell their domestic audiences a deal. That’s why I think there’s going to be a deal,” he said.
Clifton said Trump’s reelection efforts are a factor. He noted that Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross made the surprise announcement last weekend that he did not expect the U.S. to put tariffs on European autos. Europe was expected to be the next front in the administration’s trade wars.
“This is a major change in policy. Nobody in the administration gets in front of auto tariffs,” Clifton said. “What you’re seeing is the president doesn’t want to put more tariffs in place ahead of the election. That should give you guidance on China.”
I hope this choice of article has been helpful. Have a successful day.